Guinnes<span id="more-2142"></span>s World Record for Exorbitant Crown Cocktail is Shaken, Not Stirred, as Back Story Emerges

‘The Winston’ cocktail, made out of 1858 vintage cognac by a celebrity mixologist at the Crown Melbourne, ended up being part of a bungled publicity stunt that cost the casino more than a drink.

The Crown Casino in Melbourne could be stripped of a Guinness World Record because of bizarre story of a cheating Kiwi millionaire, a $32 million casino scam, a narrowly averted PR disaster, and the planet’s most expensive free cocktail.

The saga begins in September 2013, at the Crown Casino’s Club 23, a bar co-owned by Crown owner James Packer, famous cricketer that is retired Warne, and former WSOP Main Event champ Joe Hachem.

Australian media and officials from the Guinness Book of Records had collected to witness high-roller businessman Giang Nguyen imbibe the globe’s most cocktail that is expensive.

‘The Churchill,’ was made with 1858-vintage Croizet Cuvee Leonie cognac, a way of measuring Chartreuse VEP Vert (a French liqueur that is herbal-infused by monks) and splash of Angostura Bitters, among other ridiculously expensive and somewhat odd ingredients. The drink can be so called because it was purportedly the drink of choice for PM Winston Churchill and President Dwight Eisenhower as they planned the D-Day landings during WWII.

Not A cheap Date

The price tag was AU$12,500, approximately US$9,500, hence all the hullabaloo while the guy from Guinness with the clipboard keeping view.

But oddly, as current media made note, Nguyen looked uncomfortable, took one sip, declared it to be ‘good’ and hurried off to the leaving about $8000-worth of vintage booze unsipped night. The question is excatly why.

Rewind to of 2013 february. Crown announced via pr release that New Zealand millionaire James Manning would be the guy to cough up five figures because of its impossibly luxe new cocktail. Manning was lured to Crown with a member of the VIP services staff, the department that is faced with attracting and keeping whales that are high-rolling.

The plan was that Manning would come to Crown, gamble big and lose big, before obliging the casino by taking part in their publicity that is little stunt. Exactly What could possibly fail?

What Crown don’t understand was that Manning was a cheat that is skilled card countertop, and had employed some body on the inside to signal information to him. Making use of a technique that the casino has not fully elaborated upon, Manning took Crown for $32 million in just eight hands of blackjack.

‘We could not believe what he had won and a number of the bets he placed were very, very suspicious,’ a previous crown executive told the Sydney Morning Herald. ‘Those eight hands, in specific … he bet against the odds and won, so one of our surveillance guys decided to have a closer look.’

PR Catastrophe

A better look revealed that Manning and their accomplice, the guy from the VIP department who had invited him in the place that is first no less, were in cahoots, operating a complex scam to cheat the casino.

Manning was immediately turned away from his room in the center of the night and banned for eternity through the property. As the majority that is vast of money had not yet been paid, Crown chose not to press charges, but it left the PR department in a bit of the pickle.

‘Having James Manning done for a gambling heist right before the event had not been within the script,’ said a member that is former of’s PR team. ‘We had the cognac, we’d the function arranged, we just didn’t have a customer. We had been in a awful bind.’

The facts are, then, that Nguyen was a shill, a buddy of the management, bussed in at the minute that is last. The promotion stunt had been all for show and the Crown would reimburse him the complete amount the morning that is next.

Essentially, Nguyen got a drink of the world’s many expensive cocktail for free from Crown, and he wasn’t even a high model or Mariah Carey.

Macau Revenues Down Again, But Some See Signs Of Hope

Macau’s gaming industry continues to struggle, though analysts see some signs of a recovery. (Image: Ed Jones/AFP/Getty Graphics)

Macau’s gaming profits are continuing their seemingly endless tumble, falling again in June to help make it 13 straight months of decline for the Chinese enclave.

However, not all of the news being released of Macau was bad for the casinos, suggesting that as the present trends are painful, there may be hope on the horizon that things could enhance in the not-too-distant future.

First, though, there is the bad news.

Macau’s Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau reported that gambling enterprises in the territory took within just $2.2 billion in gaming revenue in June, down 36 percent in comparison to the same duration a year earlier.

That’s the figure that is lowest for Macau since November 2010.

Overall, annual gaming revenues are down about 37 percent in 2015 compared to the first 6 months of final 12 months.

Incremental Improvement Provides Some Hope

Still, the June figures were slightly much better than the projections of some analysts.

‘Although a 36 percent year-over-year decline is not even close to healthier, we find it encouraging the theme of modest comparison that is sequential remains on trend,’ said video gaming analyst Steven Wieczynski of Stifel Nicolaus Capital Markets.

The fact that things have been slightly less terrible for Macau recently is a step in the right direction in other words. There are other indications that profits could start to tick back up this summer, too.

Gaming revenues were really up over the final nine days associated with the month, which may be pertaining to the start of the summer tourism period.

If those increases continue into July, the yearly figures could start to look far better for Macau, especially considering that the final couple of months of 2014 were especially brutal for the gambling enterprises there.

Relaxed Visitation Rules Could Encourage More Tourism

A bit in addition, the Chinese government finally seems to be stepping in to help Macau. As of Wednesday, visitation rules have actually been calm, and mainland Chinese residents can now go to Macau twice per month instead than twice per every 60 day period. The maximum period of any one stay has also increased from five days to seven.

That decision caused casino that is many to surge this week. Four of five casino stocks listed in Hong Kong saw their biggest gains in the past four years, including MGM China, Wynn Macau, and Sands China.

Even in the event the actual impact of the decision is reasonably small, it could signal an improvement in policy from the mainland government that is chinese which hurt Macau’s gaming industry significantly with its anti-corruption policies that cut much of the cash movement towards the territory.

Analysts expect more supportive measures from China later on in 2015, and whether or not none among these modifications are dramatic, they might have a good effect that is cumulative.

Yet not every one of the news coming out of Macau is positive. The Macau government is presenting a smoking that is full in its legislature this week. That bill is likely to be passed later on this 12 months, and may be implemented as soon as very early year that is next.

On the basis of the impact that a ban on smoking in mass market casino areas had, analysts believe that this new ban, which would expand to more private gaming areas, could similarly damage spending by high rollers, with some predicting a 10 to 15 percent reduction in revenues because of this cigarette smoking prohibition.

Tennis Match Fixing Issues Consistently Make Headlines

Few would accuse anyone of match fixing at Wimbledon, but numerous say that the training is widespread among lower-ranked players at smaller occasions. (Image: Wikipedia)

Tennis was faced with accusations of match fixing for years: from the match that is infamous Nikolay Davydenko and Martin Vassallo Arguello in 2007 that first introduced much of the public to questions in regards to the integrity of matches in certain smaller tournaments to suspensions levied against two players earlier this year, there always seems to be something lurking beneath the sport’s surface.

Those concerns were aired again this week in a tale by The Daily Beast, which again attempted to delve through the information nowadays about tennis and find out just how much of a issue match fixing is for the sport.

One 2014 study cited in that story estimated that one percent of all first-round competition matches could be fixed, which may mean a lot more than 20 matches a year were influenced by gamblers; other quotes and guesses have recommended that multiple matches per week could be fixed, though that’s nevertheless a very small portion of all professional tennis matches.

Low Pay Leads to Temptation for Lower-Ranked Players

What makes tennis therefore vulnerable to fit fixing?

There are a combination of facets, a lot of which help explain why the situation appears most prominent at the reduced quantities of the ranks that are professional.

First, there’s the most obvious fact that tennis ( at the least in singles play) is a specific sport.

There is just one person that needs to be bribed in order to have them to throw a match (equivalent issue that leads many to fear extensive integrity issues in boxing and other combat sports), and there are no teammates or substitutes to choose up the slack for the player who is struggling.

That stated, no one is accusing Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal of repairing matches at Wimbledon.

For one, there’s the truth that these matches have an intense amount of scrutiny on them; maybe even moreover, though, star tennis players are extremely well paid, meaning it would cost anybody attempting to correct a match at that degree an exorbitant quantity of cash, if it could be done at all.

That is maybe not to say that nobody tries. Even Novak Djokovic has told a tale to be offered $100,000 to correct a match back in 2006.

But players regarding the Challenger Tour or other low-ranked competitors aren’t making nearly that much money, and could also lose cash in an offered tournament after travel and coaching expenses are taken into account.

That makes them prime objectives for gamblers trying to fix a match.

Spot Betting Allows Fixing Without Impacting Match Result

Another issue is the fact that gamblers don’t have to repair an entire match to find ways to profit.

Because many gambling sites and bookmakers offer betting on sets or even individual games, players can reach agreements to allow certain events to happen at the proper times to satisfy gamblers while still playing to win overall.

‘One particular fix that is common be to separate the first two sets to a predetermined script, then play the third set fairly to ascertain which player progresses,’ sports modeler Ian Dorward told Slate earlier this year.

The Tennis Integrity Unit is the human anatomy tasked with rooting out such issues, and they’ve often made examples of players. Each received six-month suspensions and fines for violations of anti-corruption rules, though not for match-fixing in March, Elie Rousset and Walkter Trusendi.

But no matter what the Integrity Unit does, it is unlikely to change the tradition that permits lower-ranked players to be incentivized to aid gamblers who want to make bets that are sure.

That would demand a complete change in just how compensation works down and up the various levels of expert tennis, something that probably won’t happen any time soon.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *